View Single Post
Old 10-31-2005, 06:41 PM   #23
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 246
Thanked 744 Times in 444 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orion
There is also a "relative" impact to take into account. Winnipesaukee represents about 278 miles of shoreline and associated property impact whereas the next largest lake, Winnesquam is only about 25 miles of shoreline. Not pitting one against the other, but that surely must be factored in when determining relative outflows. I know the rivers represent a significant amount of shoreline on top of that but one would think that riverfront properties would be more durable against higher levels and flows than the anomaly currently being reflected on Winni.
Lets say you decided to sacrifice the shoreline of Winnisqaum to save Winnipesaukee. You'd have to raise Winnisqaum nearly 11 inches to drop Winnipesaukee 1 inch due to the mauch greater surface area of Winnipesaukee.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote