View Single Post
Old 12-13-2013, 03:23 PM   #37
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,582
Thanks: 3,223
Thanked 1,106 Times in 796 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brk-lnt View Post
In many towns the cable system is *barely* profitable, and sometimes it takes 10 years or more before the cost of building the system returns any real profit.

Sometimes an MSO will only agree to build infrastructure in a town if they get exclusivity for some number of years. Even in cases where that doesn't exist, if one operator is active, another is unlikely to want to build a system to "fight" over a limited subscriber base.

So, the reason is really nothing more than simple economics. There aren't enough subscribers to warrant competition.
That makes sense. But the exclusive contract must end at some point and competition must be allowed. However I believe the local PUC should own the infrastructure and rent it out to whomever. There is no competition for infrastructure, just the service.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline