If speed were an issue that warranted a new law, wouldn't there be data showing an INCREASED amount of high speed accidents in the years leading up to the initial draft of the bill?
If there were even 5 'incidents' in 2004 and 10 'incidents' in 2005, then I would probably have a different opinion.
Opinions, perceptions, spin and outright lies led to a solution without a problem. This just needs to sunset, with no relevant data to support a continuation, as originally written into the bill. Anything else is just a waste of taxpayer $$.
__________________
Please do not feel the trolls.
|