View Single Post
Old 08-07-2009, 01:48 PM   #43
Shreddy
Senior Member
 
Shreddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Moultonboro
Posts: 519
Thanks: 185
Thanked 229 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meteotrade View Post
Shreddy your argument is completely illogical. I'm not sure why you think you have the right to decide which rules are worthy of enforcement and which should be disregarded. Why don't you see how much support you have over in the boating forum for getting rid of the 150' rule because breaking it "endangers no one". Apparently you share the same mentality as the rest of the law scoffing Captain B's which so many forum members are fed up with.

You have no idea why the ban on planes for Pickerel Pond even exists, you just jump to the conclusion that its a dumb rule so it should not be enforced. If I had to guess, I'd say its there for a good reason- the pond is not even a half mile wide! An obvious risk is that the plane doesn't have enough water to land/take off and an accident would result in an ecological nightmare on such a small body of water.
You're right...sorry for posting my assumptions. Please disregard and move on...
Shreddy is offline   Reply With Quote