Winnipesaukee Forum

Winnipesaukee Forum (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/index.php)
-   Boating (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Registration Increase?? What the He double hockey sticks! (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9024)

AC2717 12-13-2009 05:37 PM

Registration Increase?? What the He double hockey sticks!
 
Just received my boat registration, 1988 23footer bowrider with a 260 horse $86?
Then on Saturday received my jetski registration and it is $48 for a 640cc 1998 tigershark

What in all human are they thinking, this is an outragous increase in registration fees, when did this go through? Let me guess is this because I am out of state and the wonderful democrats in Concord found yet another way to screw out of state'rs to pay for ridiculous. Not only are they killing me on the property tax with no benefits, now I am getting hosed on these. I have half a mind to register these in MA

PC31 12-14-2009 08:45 AM

If you register in Mass you will have to pay sales tax (based on price of boat when purchased) on both boats.
Good luck with that!
________
Free drupal themes

townsde 12-14-2009 09:30 AM

When I purchased my boat last June and registereed it, I was told that all boat and car registrations would increase effective July 1. This was implemented because the state revenues were down and the state was looking for ways to INCREASE INCOME. Now this makes a lot of sense to some people but not to me. They raised fees that I pay but of course many of us were going through the same thing the state was since our incomes were also down. You can rest assured that when the state budget is balanced and the economy rebounds, these fees will not be lowered again EVER.

wifi 12-14-2009 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by townsde (Post 114287)
... You can rest assured that when the state budget is balanced and the economy rebounds, these fees will not be lowered again EVER.

The exact reason no one in their right mind wants a sales or income tax in NH. Just control spending instead.

gf2020 12-14-2009 10:14 AM

Here in MA, they just raised the trailer registration fees by an outrageous amount.

Previously, I paid $20 per year to register my trailer, now they charge $20 per 1000 pounds of gross capacity so my trailer which weighs 1000 pounds and can carry 5000 pounds now costs $120 per year. :eek:

In the grand scheme of things, I can afford the additional $100 per year, but there is no justification for this kind of increase.

fatlazyless 12-14-2009 10:29 AM

Last winter, in approximately Febuary 2009, the Marine Patrol Director initiated a boat registration fee increase by asking a state rep to sponsor his suggestions. The Director supposedly said that the registration fees had remained the same since 1989, and the Marine Patrol could definately use more money to spend on operations especially with the new speed law enforcement plus every
thing else.

As I read in the newspaper, the hoped for increases were not approved by the legisature which surprised me. It could be that an increase was quietly made part of some other bill which did pass? In the NH legislature, there's always another way to skin a cat. What we need is more information. Maybe the Union Leader will put one of their ace investigative reporters on this case?

What happened? How many radar guns and certified training-to-operate officers do they need? Is there any truth to the rumor that the Marine Patrol flagship vessel, a 42' former Coast Guard launch, just recently received a six-person size luxury hot-tub installed onto the fantail of the boat. People who know, say the boat has already been renamed the "Hubba-Hubba"!

So's, at least your registration money goes to a good cause.......hubba that....10-4......code 3......over!

AC2717 12-14-2009 11:55 AM

I knew I read somewhere that the direct bill was defeated last year, does anyone know how exactly the increase happened, can anyone dig and expose this?

Wolfeboro_Baja 12-14-2009 01:04 PM

Here's the link to the previous thread on this subject; http://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/...ead.php?t=7978

According to an article in the Citizen back in January 2009, http://www.citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll...-1/CITNEWS0103, state rep Richard Drisko (R-Hollis) sponsored a bill to increase boat registration fees. The state's website won't let me view the bill so I can't see what became of it but I know it failed. Eventually, increased boat registration fees were added to HB2 (the state budget bill), http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legi...09/HB0002.html.

Here's the pertinent section:
Quote:

144:144 Registration Fees. Amend RSA 270-E:5, I to read as follows:

I. The registration fees for commercial, private, and pleasure vessels, including rentals and airboats shall be as follows:

(a) Up to and including 16 feet [$12] $24

(b) 16.1 feet to 21 feet [$17] $34

(c) 21.1 feet to 30 feet [$26] $52

(d) 30.1 feet to 45 feet [$36] $72

(e) 45.1 feet and over [$46] $92
Don't forget there are additional fees (lake restoration and preservation fee, agent fee, etc.) that make up the total you pay to register. I can't keep track of all of them so you're on your own to figure those out.

Lastly, if you read the Citizen article linked above, you'll see they state the boat registration fees haven't increased since 1979, so 30 yrs since this fee has seen an increase. Does the timing suck? Yes. Do I enjoy paying a higher registration fee? No. Does Marine Patrol need it? Yes. Is an increase long overdue? Probably. So do what I do, suck it up.

Wolfeboro_Baja 12-14-2009 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wifi (Post 114290)
The exact reason no one in their right mind wants a sales or income tax in NH. Just control spending instead.

I'm curious, if no one wants a sales tax or income tax because they are broad-based taxes, what exactly is a property tax? Because it doesn't get any broader than a property tax!! We all live somewhere and we either pay it directly (as a landowner) or indirectly (as a tenant renting from a landowner).

I would rather pay a tax that's based on my ability to pay (sales or income) than on somebody else's guess at what my property is worth!! And yes, spending does need to be controlled better (unfortunately, that's easier said than done).

tis 12-14-2009 01:34 PM

If they got a sales or income tax, they would just spend more. And even if they SAID one of these other taxes would replace property taxes, they could always reinstate them later. And I firmly believe they would. I have never, ever seen a government that has enough money.

wifi 12-14-2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfeboro_Baja (Post 114305)
I would rather pay a tax that's based on my ability to pay (sales or income) than on somebody else's guess at what my property is worth!!......

Lets take a hypothetical example: Suppose you spent most of your money buying a waterfront home on Meredith Neck, and the rest of your money buying a condo in Waterville Valley. Now you have no money left and hence no 'ability to pay' (where have I heard this before?) taxes. Should it be my responsibility to carry the freight on the value of property you now own?

YES, I agree assessments ummm.. lets say have a long way go to before being 'fair'.

Pineedles 12-14-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tis (Post 114308)
If they got a sales or income tax, they would just spend more. And even if they SAID one of these other taxes would replace property taxes, they could always reinstate them later. And I firmly believe they would. I have never, ever seen a government that has enough money.

You said it! We still have an income tax here in CT after it was adopted nearly 20 years ago as a temporary adjustment to a rough year. BS! Despite adding Slot-machine revenue we're still being taxed higher and higher and neaded for a billion dollar shortfall. If they institute an income tax in NH, it's still not going to satisfy them. They'll always want more.:fire:

Airwaves 12-14-2009 02:51 PM

Why is anyone suprised, it's simple math!
 
Without opening the can of worms that is Sales and Income tax debates, getting back to the issue at hand.

1. The Marine Patrol is funded through boat registations, not the general fund (Taxes).

2. Boat registrations in NH have been on the decline over the past several years. Meaning the budget for the Marine Patrol has been affected.

3. Boat registration fees have not increased while the costs of operating, maintaining the fleet of Marine Patrol boats, and manpower costs has. So couple that with a drop in the funding from the number of boats registered in NH and you get a negative impact on the Marine Patrol budget.

4. If you pay your boat registration bill via the town in which you live or own property, the town takes a cut of the payment, an agent fee if you will, further reducing the amont of money getting to the Marine Patrol

5. Laws approved by the legislature that "don't cost anything" really do!

So with boat registrations dropping and the Marine Patrol not getting funding from taxpayer sources there are two alternatives. Raise the fees or cut the Marine Patrol.

Which do you want to do?

Wolfeboro_Baja 12-14-2009 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wifi (Post 114315)
Lets take a hypothetical example: Suppose you spent most of your money buying a waterfront home on Meredith Neck, and the rest of your money buying a condo in Waterville Valley. Now you have no money left and hence no 'ability to pay' (where have I heard this before?) taxes. Should it be my responsibility to carry the freight on the value of property you now own?

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but if I don't pay my property taxes in your example, at some point, the town will seize the property for non-payment and eventually auction it off for the taxes due. So no, it's not your responsibility. If I have to pay a tax, I still prefer a tax based on one's ability to pay.


Quote:

Originally Posted by wifi (Post 114315)
YES, I agree assessments ummm.. lets say have a long way go to before being 'fair'.

They will never be fair.

LIforrelaxin 12-14-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wifi (Post 114290)
The exact reason no one in their right mind wants a sales or income tax in NH. Just control spending instead.

I love hearing these arguments. The state spending is what it is. The problem in NH, is not that the state spending is out of control, anymore then anyother state. The problem is that unlike other states, NH has limited where it can take money from. So while other states raise money through sales tax and Income Tax, thus keeping property taxes in check. NH has decided to do a majority of it funding through Property Tax and assesing use fees... yes registering your boat is nothing more then a use fee.

Now because of this things like boat registrations are going to go up so that the MP can be funded. I am not surprised by this and no else should be either. The only thing I want to know is that the Money I put towards my boat does indeed go towards the MP, state access to public bodies of water etc. And doesn't end up in the general fund, with out strings attached. As long as the Money is going where it should I have not problem with the cost of registraring my boat going up.

People run scared of Income and Sales tax, because they don't take the time to understand how it would change the burden. Now I am not saying the property tax is ever going to go back down it will not. However if NH doesn't want to see property tax increases any more, of use fees continue to rise. Then the people of NH, better dam well start learning more, and educating themselve so that they understand the financial burdens of the state aren't going anywhere... However they can help shift the burden from a few select area's to others.

I have often said, a simple 1 % sales tax in NH would lead to an enourmous income for the state. And if it was implimented with controls, would solve most of the states budgetary short falls.

lawn psycho 12-14-2009 04:51 PM

Registration in NH by out of stater
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PC31 (Post 114284)
If you register in Mass you will have to pay sales tax (based on price of boat when purchased) on both boats.
Good luck with that!

You have to be careful with this one... If you buy the boat in NH and leave it there you are required to register the boat in NH. However, your home state still wants the sales and excise tax.

I can speak about what Maine does. If you finance the boat through a Maine bank, they will come looking for the sales tax. If you buy the boat in NH (and are a Maine resident) and then eventually sell the boat to someone in Maine, the Maine revenue service will send you a nice little letter about the boat sales tax never having been properly paid and will kindly tell you the amount to fork over.

lawn psycho 12-14-2009 04:56 PM

Don't do it!!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin (Post 114335)
I love hearing these arguments. The state spending is what it is. The problem in NH, is not that the state spending is out of control, anymore then anyother state. The problem is that unlike other states, NH has limited where it can take money from. So while other states raise money through sales tax and Income Tax, thus keeping property taxes in check. NH has decided to do a majority of it funding through Property Tax and assesing use fees... yes registering your boat is nothing more then a use fee.

Now because of this things like boat registrations are going to go up so that the MP can be funded. I am not surprised by this and no else should be either. The only thing I want to know is that the Money I put towards my boat does indeed go towards the MP, state access to public bodies of water etc. And doesn't end up in the general fund, with out strings attached. As long as the Money is going where it should I have not problem with the cost of registraring my boat going up.

People run scared of Income and Sales tax, because they don't take the time to understand how it would change the burden. Now I am not saying the property tax is ever going to go back down it will not. However if NH doesn't want to see property tax increases any more, of use fees continue to rise. Then the people of NH, better dam well start learning more, and educating themselve so that they understand the financial burdens of the state aren't going anywhere... However they can help shift the burden from a few select area's to others.

I have often said, a simple 1 % sales tax in NH would lead to an enourmous income for the state. And if it was implimented with controls, would solve most of the states budgetary short falls.

You are dreaming if you think it will stay at 1%. As a previous NH resident who now lives in Maine, trust me when I say to stay away from the income and sales taxes. RUN!!!

I pay high property taxes in Maine. Even still, if you doubled my property taxes and took away the sales and income taxes I would be thousands of dollars farther ahead.

Maine has every tax under the sun and still has huge shortfalls.

Do not fall for the income and sales tax trap. You will regret it. I can't wait for the day to return as a NH resident.

tis 12-14-2009 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawn psycho (Post 114337)
You are dreaming if you think it will stay at 1%. As a previous NH resident who now lives in Maine, trust me when I say to stay away from the income and sales taxes. RUN!!!

I pay high property taxes in Maine. Even still, if you doubled my property taxes and took away the sales and income taxes I would be thousands of dollars farther ahead.

Maine has every tax under the sun and still has huge shortfalls.

Do not fall for the income and sales tax trap. You will regret it. I can't wait for the day to return as a NH resident.

Absolutely, you are so right! LIF is a dreamer to think that. We HAVE taken the time to understand. As you said, look at Maine, and as Pineneedles said, look at Conn. I remember when Conn. put in that sales tax, it was going to solve all their problems. Right.
As far as I am concerned cut MP, cut lots of spending. It won't bother me one single bit.

LIforrelaxin 12-14-2009 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tis (Post 114338)
Absolutely, you are so right! LIF is a dreamer to think that. We HAVE taken the time to understand. As you said, look at Maine, and as Pineneedles said, look at Conn. I remember when Conn. put in that sales tax, it was going to solve all their problems. Right.
As far as I am concerned cut MP, cut lots of spending. It won't bother me one single bit.

Now this is interesting..... TIS, do you realize that if they cut the MP, then there would be no policing on the lakes. The noise laws, hell even what ever they do for the speed limit law would be all for not. If people think the lake is bad now, with out the MP it would be every boater for themselves.

Now what spending would you like to see cut.....

Let see how about the State Police???
or how about the highway dept...... what is going ot happen when it snows

alright so cutting those things may be extreme but they are cuts right.

Now don't get me wrong, any government has room to cut. But it isn't as easy as everyone wants it to be.

Now as for those that think they are better of with out Income or Sales Tax, let me say this. At this point, you may definately be better of with just the property tax. But there is a threshold.... and eventually the Property tax will get to be to much. When you average person can no longer afford to live in NH, then what? Remember Income and Sales tax is based upon someone income level... the more you want the more you make the more you pay.... Property Tax on the other hand is what it is..... if you are an average individual or a multi-millionare, the particular piece of property is taxed the same. The Rich guy may be able to afford it but the average Joe can't..... So what happens to the state when property taxes are so high that an average Joe can't afford to own property???????? That is where NH is headed.... they will be the first state to find that out.......

Remember this, no matter what the money is going to be raised.... either give the legislature other arena's to spread the burden too, or don't complain, when it is 200$ to registrar your boat, or 1000$ to registrar your car, or you are having to sell you family home because the property taxes are to much.

As for lawn physco comment, I really doubt you would be better off, pay double the property tax.... remember you don't just pay state income Tax, there is federal income tax..... I have done the calculations for myself here in Massachusetts...... it is all a mute point.... you really just still pay the same amount to the state.

NoRegrets 12-14-2009 05:24 PM

Every penny the governmeent spends means a tax or fee that needs to be collected from the population. Currently in Washington they have evolved to our current situation where every dollar they spend includes 43 cents that they borrowed. This is an extreme preversion of a process. NH is nowhere near that level of incompetance. IFALLOWED - give the state government more money and it may create a rush to spending caused by well meaning politicians that will get us into the same budget crisis as Calif, Conn, Mass, NJ, NY, Minn, etc.
Saying no to big government and new taxes is the only sure fire way to keep the budget in check.

lawn psycho 12-14-2009 05:40 PM

I've done the math.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin (Post 114342)
Now this is interesting..... TIS, do you realize that if they cut the MP, then there would be no policing on the lakes. The noise laws, hell even what ever they do for the speed limit law would be all for not. If people think the lake is bad now, with out the MP it would be every boater for themselves.

Now what spending would you like to see cut.....

Let see how about the State Police???
or how about the highway dept...... what is going ot happen when it snows

alright so cutting those things may be extreme but they are cuts right.

Now don't get me wrong, any government has room to cut. But it isn't as easy as everyone wants it to be.

Now as for those that think they are better of with out Income or Sales Tax, let me say this. At this point, you may definately be better of with just the property tax. But there is a threshold.... and eventually the Property tax will get to be to much. When you average person can no longer afford to live in NH, then what? Remember Income and Sales tax is based upon someone income level... the more you want the more you make the more you pay.... Property Tax on the other hand is what it is..... if you are an average individual or a multi-millionare, the particular piece of property is taxed the same. The Rich guy may be able to afford it but the average Joe can't..... So what happens to the state when property taxes are so high that an average Joe can't afford to own property???????? That is where NH is headed.... they will be the first state to find that out.......

Remember this, no matter what the money is going to be raised.... either give the legislature other arena's to spread the burden too, or don't complain, when it is 200$ to registrar your boat, or 1000$ to registrar your car, or you are having to sell you family home because the property taxes are to much.

As for lawn physco comment, I really doubt you would be better off, pay double the property tax.... remember you don't just pay state income Tax, there is federal income tax..... I have done the calculations for myself here in Massachusetts...... it is all a mute point.... you really just still pay the same amount to the state.

Are you a local politician? (serious question)

As far as the math, it's quite simple. I get hammered with proprty taxes and yet Maine still has sales and income taxes. More taxes added to the collection stream are not the answer.
I have a family member who does taxes professionally and every spring this same topic comes up when he does ours. I would be about $6k further in the black if my family moved back to NH, living in a omparable town and home.

As far as it being a wash, no way. Again, double my property taxes and and get rid of the sales and income tax and I'm way ahead. Maine deductions do not follow the Federal return in several area. Hence you can have a sizeable Federal return and owe on the state return. Been there, done that.

tis 12-14-2009 06:01 PM

The government was created to take care of our infrastructure and defend our country. When it became our nanny, taking care of all of us, is when we went out of control. And they really don't give a damn about us, they just want votes. They want us to be dependent on the government just like we are! I believe anything they cut would be taken up by the private sector. After all there are tons of programs that overlap and are unnecessary, unless of course it is your favorite little baby. That is the problem people want their own favorite little thing. Of course it is easy for me to say, because I am the PAYER, not the receiver.

lawn psycho 12-14-2009 06:08 PM

Maine wins again (or not)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin (Post 114342)
Now this is interesting..... TIS, do you realize that if they cut the MP, then there would be no policing on the lakes. The noise laws, hell even what ever they do for the speed limit law would be all for not. If people think the lake is bad now, with out the MP it would be every boater for themselves.

Now what spending would you like to see cut.....

Let see how about the State Police???
or how about the highway dept...... what is going ot happen when it snows

alright so cutting those things may be extreme but they are cuts right.

Now don't get me wrong, any government has room to cut. But it isn't as easy as everyone wants it to be.

Now as for those that think they are better of with out Income or Sales Tax, let me say this. At this point, you may definately be better of with just the property tax. But there is a threshold.... and eventually the Property tax will get to be to much. When you average person can no longer afford to live in NH, then what? Remember Income and Sales tax is based upon someone income level... the more you want the more you make the more you pay.... Property Tax on the other hand is what it is..... if you are an average individual or a multi-millionare, the particular piece of property is taxed the same. The Rich guy may be able to afford it but the average Joe can't..... So what happens to the state when property taxes are so high that an average Joe can't afford to own property???????? That is where NH is headed.... they will be the first state to find that out.......

Remember this, no matter what the money is going to be raised.... either give the legislature other arena's to spread the burden too, or don't complain, when it is 200$ to registrar your boat, or 1000$ to registrar your car, or you are having to sell you family home because the property taxes are to much.

As for lawn physco comment, I really doubt you would be better off, pay double the property tax.... remember you don't just pay state income Tax, there is federal income tax..... I have done the calculations for myself here in Massachusetts...... it is all a mute point.... you really just still pay the same amount to the state.

Forgot to mention, even with the sales and income taxes, the Maine vehicle excise tax is higher than NH. I pray that NH never falls for the income and sales tax trap.

AC2717 12-14-2009 06:16 PM

Wow
 
Talk about getting my thread Hy-Jacked:offtopic:

robmac 12-14-2009 06:43 PM

I remember way back when I lived in MA. The cry came out for a temporary tax increase,well it never to this day has gone down. If my company spends to much money,well I take it on the chin. Isn't that a BUDGET?? You spend to much look at areas to purchase and spend better on services. I haven't had a raise in 5 years and I still make ends meet,it's not rocket science give them another revenue source and it'll be gone before it's collected.

Rattlesnake Guy 12-14-2009 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin (Post 114335)
I have often said, a simple 1 % sales tax in NH would lead to an enourmous income for the state. And if it was implimented with controls, would solve most of the states budgetary short falls.

I wonder what year this was first said in Mass?

Pineedles 12-15-2009 09:32 AM

Just to keep the record straight. I am not opposed to boat registration fees going up if it all goes to MP. We need more enforcement for boneheads out there. I am simply warning of "new" taxes that will supposedly cure temporary ills.

Lakegeezer 12-15-2009 09:42 AM

Good source of revenue
 
The increases in watercraft registration fees make sense to me. After the business and interest/dividend taxes, the state lives largely on usage tax and profits on liquor. The state is going broke. Yes, it should find services to cut, but today, it is going broke. Doubling the registration fees on watercraft use causes grumbling, but most people will dig into their wallets and pay it. The public also grumbles about needing more enforcement of the marine nanny laws, including speed, passage and rafting. This doesn't come for free. Pay for play, I say.

PC31 12-15-2009 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawn psycho (Post 114336)
You have to be careful with this one... If you buy the boat in NH and leave it there you are required to register the boat in NH. However, your home state still wants the sales and excise tax.

I can speak about what Maine does. If you finance the boat through a Maine bank, they will come looking for the sales tax. If you buy the boat in NH (and are a Maine resident) and then eventually sell the boat to someone in Maine, the Maine revenue service will send you a nice little letter about the boat sales tax never having been properly paid and will kindly tell you the amount to fork over.

I have not had that problem yet.

BroadHopper 12-15-2009 12:24 PM

For 17 years
 
I have lived in Mass, but kept my boat in NH. Mass have never ask for taxes on the boat. Probably because I purchase my boats in NH.

I registered my motor vehicles in Mass. The boat and boat trailer were registered in NH because the boat and trailer were stored in NH. Same as the snow machine.

LIforrelaxin 12-15-2009 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroadHopper (Post 114409)
I have lived in Mass, but kept my boat in NH. Mass have never ask for taxes on the boat. Probably because I purchase my boats in NH.

I registered my motor vehicles in Mass. The boat and boat trailer were registered in NH because the boat and trailer were stored in NH. Same as the snow machine.

I do the same, thing.... I also did this when I lived in vermont.... no problems.....

However as someone mentioned I have heard of Maine having some catch 22 with this practice.....

Wolfeboro_Baja 12-15-2009 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tis (Post 114349)
......I believe anything they cut would be taken up by the private sector......

I'm sorry but I think you're dreaming now. The reason the government is involved in so many programs is because the private sector can't be bothered; it cuts into their profits!


Quote:

Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin (Post 114411)
......However as someone mentioned I have heard of Maine having some catch 22 with this practice.....

Leave it to Maine! They're the only state I know that will tax BOTH spouses income if only one of them works in Maine!!!! It may be a beautiful state but talk about taxation without representation!!

I apologize for going off-topic again. :)

lawn psycho 12-15-2009 01:41 PM

From experience
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BroadHopper (Post 114409)
I have lived in Mass, but kept my boat in NH. Mass have never ask for taxes on the boat. Probably because I purchase my boats in NH.

I registered my motor vehicles in Mass. The boat and boat trailer were registered in NH because the boat and trailer were stored in NH. Same as the snow machine.

I'm speaking from experience. I don't know about other states. When I financed my first boat through a bank in CT, I was fine. I then refinanced it to a lower rate a year later at a local in Maine and about 2 months after that I got a letter from the Maine Revenue service. Boat was never in the state of Maine as it was slipped and stored at Winni.

A co-worker had his boat in NH and when he sold it to a guy in Maine, he got bagged. The new owner went to register the boat it requires listing the previous owner. It popped up that the sales tax had never been paid on the boat. He had to cough it up.

BroadHopper 12-15-2009 01:56 PM

Business in NH
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lawn psycho (Post 114418)
I'm speaking from experience. I don't know about other states. When I financed my first boat through a bank in CT, I was fine. I then refinanced it to a lower rate a year later at a local in Maine and about 2 months after that I got a letter from the Maine Revenue service. Boat was never in the state of Maine as it was slipped and stored at Winni.

A co-worker had his boat in NH and when he sold it to a guy in Maine, he got bagged. The new owner went to register the boat it requires listing the previous owner. It popped up that the sales tax had never been paid on the boat. He had to cough it up.

All the more reason not to do business in Maine. I finance my boat from a CU in CA. I don't think it was required to tell Mass state. Commonwealth? Whatever.

LIforrelaxin 12-15-2009 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroadHopper (Post 114420)
All the more reason not to do business in Maine. I finance my boat from a CU in CA. I don't think it was required to tell Mass state. Commonwealth? Whatever.

The way Ma. and Vt work, is that you only pay Tax on the boat if you register and use it in the state ( a use Tax). Much like a car. If you use it else where and it never comes into the state then they just don't care. However don't be a Ma. / VT resident and get caught using a boat in Ma. / VT that is registered in another state, and has your name on the tittle....

Now when it comes to the trailer, if you have a seperate Bill of Sale for the trailer, Ma. will let you register the trailer and only pay tax on that. In Vermont however this didn't work, if I had registered the boat trailer they would have taxed me for the boat too....

In short all states handle things differently.

All this I became very aware of, when I looked into Boating Cirtificates, ownership, and registration laws, some odd years back......

Airwaves 12-15-2009 02:18 PM

Just for the record. The Massachusetts "sales" tax is actually a sales and use tax. If it's not purchased or used in Massachusetts then the state has no claim on it. (See recent court ruling re: Town Fair Tire)
Massachusetts imposes the "sales" tax when the boat is registered in Massachusetts, not at the point of purchase.

Now, getting back to the issue at hand. I got my renewal today and it was up by $20. This is the only source of funding that I am aware of for the NH Marine Patrol.

If you want to look at some of the boating stats many of the rescues performed by the Marine Patrol, especially early in the season, are of vessels that do not pay the registration fee! Think about it!

fatlazyless 12-15-2009 10:48 PM

Excuuuuuse me while I briefly interupt this love-in over property taxes and an income tax.....ahem.....and add a suggestion on the boat registration fees.

Maybe I am all wet on this, but as I recall, the individual marinas were to get a pay raise from one to five dollars for doing the registration paperwork. But, by going to the Marine Patrol in Glendale-Gilford, you save the five dollar charge. Plus, the Marine Patrol knows all the ins & outs, ups & downs of boat registration fees and is most likely to get it correct the first time. Plus, you get to park in one of their three designated visiter parking spaces which are located about 12" from the lake.........way cool.......every business should have parking like this!

ApS 12-16-2009 07:08 AM

There's No Fee for Hip-Wader Use, Either!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Airwaves (Post 114426)
"...If you want to look at some of the boating stats many of the rescues performed by the Marine Patrol, especially early in the season, are of vessels that do not pay the registration fee! Think about it...!"

Why, those scoff-laws!!! :fire: The Marine Patrol should be cracking down on people who don't pay the Registration Fee!

Ohhhhhh... You meant the paddlers, rowers, windsurfers, sailboats under 12' in length, plus inflatable craft who aren't yet affected by taxation—I get it now.

Yup: New eight-dollar fees will go a long way in helping the MPs enforce stickers on paddlecraft—and to pay the retirements of those State employees hired to collect the then-new $23 fees placed on sailboats back in the 80s). :rolleye2:

Why not a Luxury Tax on canoes assessed at over $150? :rolleye1:

:idea: Say, hiring more government workers will reduce unemployment!

VtSteve 12-16-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acres per Second (Post 114459)
Why, those scoff-laws!!! :fire: The Marine Patrol should be cracking down on people who don't pay the Registration Fee!

Ohhhhhh... You meant the paddlers, rowers, windsurfers, sailboats under 12' in length, plus inflatable craft who aren't yet affected by taxation—I get it now.

Yup: New eight-dollar fees will go a long way in helping the MPs enforce stickers on paddlecraft—and to pay the retirements of those State employees hired to collect the then-new $23 fees placed on sailboats back in the 80s). :rolleye2:

Why not a Luxury Tax on canoes assessed at over $150? :rolleye1:

:idea: Say, hiring more government workers will reduce unemployment!

So now you're worried about MP enforcement costs? Sailboats, canoes and kayaks account for a large part of MP assists as it is. Same with smaller fishing boats, as evidenced from the spring. I would assume as more people get interested in paddling and sailing, more assists will be needed.

The NHMP has a big job statewide. Accidents and incidents are up, and comparable to the great weather summer/Fall of 2006, when there was a lot more boating activity and good weather than this year. Just like everything else, the MP either gets more funding, or cuts services. Maybe they should act like Sea Tow, and just assist those that are paying members :rolleye2:

Courtesy inspections are way, way down since 2005. While other government agencies have become bloated, perhaps the MP's budget needs to be brought higher? A cursory look at the stats would show this is true. How else are they going to be able to enforce and argue about rafting in Braun Bay?

Airwaves 12-16-2009 01:47 PM

Originally posted by APS
Quote:

Ohhhhhh... You meant the paddlers, rowers, windsurfers, sailboats under 12' in length, plus inflatable craft who aren't yet affected by taxation—I get it now.

Yup: New eight-dollar fees will go a long way in helping the MPs enforce stickers on paddlecraft—and to pay the retirements of those State employees hired to collect the then-new $23 fees placed on sailboats back in the 80s).
Yep, that's exactly who I mean, the estimated hundreds of thousands of paddlers, rowers, windsurfers, sailboats under 12 feet that use the waters and need to call the Marine Patrol for help. Not to mention the fact that when those vessels are found floating in the lakes or ocean capsized there is no way to check with the owner to see if it broke loose or someone is actually missing (currently there is no way to know who such a vessel belongs to) so search and rescue is launched...

Yep, that's exactly who I mean!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.