![]() |
Quote:
Personally, I think he's just reveling in the fact that he will get the last laugh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is this really the precedence you'd like to set, make up a story start an investigation and have political hit jobs going on back and forth between rival parties? All you need to do is open an investigation then search for ANYTHING that might destroy the subject. If that's where we are going I suggest doing the same for every member of congress starting with those that have been there the longest! We shall see what comes out from this release of information but I can bet the contents will put the entire basis of this investigation in question, and furthermore could very well show that coordination of this may have reached beyond the DOJ and FBI. Now I'm no Obama lover, frankly I didn't like him at all, but I really hope this doesn't uncover that he was a knowing participant because that would be unfortunate. While I never liked his policies I'd like to think he had enough integrity to not condone this sort of thing never mind being a participant. I understand politics is an ugly business, but these days it's not ugly it's disgusting when in the pursuit of power people are destroying one another. This sets the stage and example for everyone else - when leaders act like this is there no surprise that the electorate is equally divided and confrontational. Difference of opinion is one thing, letting that get as combative as it has is destructive to this nation as a whole I don't care what political ideology you happen to adhere to. Sadly I firmly believe there are forces at work that want this country to be tore apart and destroyed and the big question is why? |
Quote:
One could reasonably assume that if the FISA warrant was indeed obtained illegally, lawyers would have jumped all over that when defending Manafort, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Gates, Van Der Zwaan, Pinedo, Patten and Cohen. It would have been the easiest defense to mount. Basically, the FISA warrant legality question comes down to believing either: A. That a whole bunch of expensive defense attorneys all forgot to implement the easiest defense ever. AND A guy who lies all the time is telling the truth, this time. OR B. The FISA warrant was legally obtained. I'm pragmatic, I believe option B. All those convictions/guilty pleas make it to impossible to believe option A. |
Quote:
Get your timeline straight. When the FISA warrants were obtained, no one knew they were based on the Democrat paid for dossier. NONE of the convictions involve Trump or supposed Russian collusion. Most of the convictions involve lying to FBI during interviews. Only Manafort's appears to be substantive, but for wrongdoings way before he was ever involved with Trump or his election. All the rest are for providing false official statements. Only recently did we become aware that warrants were obtained by using false information so the defendants did not have that defense available to them at that time. It appears that Carter Page may be reneging on his plea deal. It also appears that all of the people who accepted plea deals are in for a huge payday. Anyway, you're just trolling. If you can't see how despicable and dishonorable democrats have been since the election, there's no convincing you otherwise. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Keep in mind that the FISA warrant was the entry point to this investigation and in particular to watch Carter Page who ironically has never been charged with anything. That was the door opening to the FBI and DOJ to go on a fishing expedition for whatever they could find. The others who have been caught in this have been charged with making misleading statements which in and of itself is bad, but they have not lead the investigation that we know of to any significant findings related to the core purpose of this investigation. The validity of the FISA warrant cannot be used as a defense of these individuals because them being targeted is a separate issue. How is Manafort going to use that as a defense for example? What he did and got busted for is a completely separate issue all together. That doesn't clear him from wrong doing just saying they are in no way related - in fact if I'm not mistaken the prosecution of that case was handed off to a different group of people.
The bigger issue here is the way this investigation started, based on what evidence and so forth. While the FISA application presented may have been legal and approved by a judge, the omission of facts related to the supporting evidence presented to obtain it is what is in question. Clearly if there were omissions or misleading information presented to secure this warrant then that is a big problem, especially when you look at who knew what when these were signed off. The evidence thus far as reported is indicating that dossier was a key piece of evidence presented, those that signed off on the warrant knew who gathered that information and who paid for it, and there was a clear link between Fusion GPS, Steel, Ohr who was the conduit to backchannel information into the feds. Such an elaborate scheme only leads one to conclude somebody was trying to cover their tracks. Then we have the leaking of information to the media all done and timed in a coordinated fashion. Something here stinks really bad. Bottom line the whole basis of this "investigation" seems to be a complete sham but when you have the head honchos at the FBI and DOJ pushing this who's going to question it? Where is the oversight of their actions? Why isn't any of this being looked at. How Mueller can honestly keep this going knowing the entire basis of this was tainted shows me one of two things. He has zero integrity or another partisan hack. What's sad about this is that the credibility of both the DOJ and FBI have been seriously damaged by this. That should be the big story coming out of this, but it seems that is irrelevant to many on the left as the end justifies the means. That's pretty scary. It will be interesting to see what comes out with all the information that gets declassified. If the dems are crying national security and keep it away from the public eye, and now the UK is crying as well, there has to be some interesting information coming that they don't want in the public arena. It begs the question as to why. Soon enough we'll find out. |
"Shadow Government", "Shadow-Banning"—Heard of it?
Quote:
If you have a Smart Phone, you can tune-out from TV ONCE, and tune-in to Hannity on 610 AM-radio at WGIR-Manchester. During just one three hour show, he will educate you with everything we're discussing here—and how media is propagandizing with every broadcast. It's alarming how the Electorate has become so propagandized! They don't know that, first, the IRS became "weaponized". Now it's the DOJ and FBI! :eek: :confused: Who knows how extensive the "Deep State" has become—except that Obama maintains an office in sight of the White House. :eek: (And his former advisor, Valerie Jarrett, shares the house with him). :confused: Why do I have to search for the British Daily Mail for a picture of Obama's newly-gated, rental-mansion? Is it because Google is "shadow-banning" such photographs? :eek2: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017...3719818389.jpg Quote:
Why would you ever vote Democrat, seeing they are morphing into Democratic-Socialists? They'll be the ones "in charge of supplying the food"! :eek: https://i.servimg.com/u/f91/18/11/38/95/fullsc20.jpg |
Quote:
|
It's easy to say that FOX news is right and everyone else is wrong when your way of thinking aligns with the slant the commentators have. Anyone of a liberal mindset would say just the opposite and that MSNBC or CNN or fill in tbe blank is telling the truth and correct and FOX news or Newsmax (another great channel) is wrong. They all get things wrong but I do agree these days CNN and MSNBC are the worst at pushing stories that aren't accurate or flat out wrong. People now a days aren't interested in "unbiased" news anymore they want it delivered in a package of their liking.
The commentators are what they are, much as I like Hannity after a while I get a little tired of him because at times he simply over does it just like Maddow who I can barely stand to listen to for 10 minutes. Tucker Carlson is pretty good and probably the most level headed opinion guy out there. Glad he's got that show defiantly an upgrade from O'Reilly. |
Ellison (D) and Brennan...(D)
This Brian Williams?
https://hyperallergic.com/wp-content...members-11.jpg Quote:
It's allowed in that "system". ("Just don't hit 'em where it shows"). :eek2: As for Brennan: When I got a U. S. Navy Classified Clearance, I was asked if I'd ever joined the W.E.B. DuBois Society. That name, W.E.B. DuBois, an American Communist, showed up on the 1976 ballot for the Presidency. :eek: Probably the briefest YouTube you've ever seen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEnlAu_edNg |
Quote:
|
'Never to Be Seen on The Media...
Quote:
• Accuser hired same attorney who "Borked" Republican's previous nominee, Robert Bork. "Was also involved with Anita Hill’s decision to testify against Supreme Court Nominee Clarence Thomas"—Politico Audio recording of plot: http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/21/ri...eat-kavanaugh/ • High School Yearbook scrubbed of accuser's sex/alcohol environment: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...s-and-elitism/ • Her witness, Ms. Keyser, does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Christine Ford.” https://ktvq.com/cnn-us-politics/201...d-about-party/ • A third named witness denies accuser's allegations. https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...s-allegations/ • Christine Blasey Ford is a co-author of at least eight published scientific papers produced by the pharmaceutical giant to promote its mifepristone abortion pills. http://www.corcept.com/prod... • Christine Ford’s brother was formerly employed at the D.C. offices of Baker & Hostetler LLP. That’s the same firm that made payments over half a million dollars to Fusion GPS. https://www.pacificpundit.com/2018/0...to-fusion-gps/ • Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent towards, or resistance against lawful authority...—Wikipedia • Expect a book, a movie, and that the accuser—however discredited—will become a millionaire. :rolleye1: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you were President Trump, what would you think about 43 former Obama "Czars" who have converted to Civil-Service employment in DC—impervious to firing while creating mischief or treason? :mad: ("Czar" Van Jones was outed as an admitted Communist—founder of a Communist cell—and resigned). Quote:
Quote:
An effort (later abandoned) by Republicans was picked up the Democrats (Hillary's DNC), who gave it to a DC attorney group (Perkins-Coie), who contracted with "Fusion GPS", a group who has, as a member, Nellie Ohr. Her husband, Bruce Ohr works at the FBI... Quote:
Quote:
https://i.harperapps.com/covers/9780062851567/x400.jpg . |
If only the good people of this great country could somehow be awakened or enlightened to see “beyond” the extremely, biased mainstream media...
I would like to think it’s happening slowly but I fear their minds are too closed and they feel the need to follow their party (democrat) right over the cliff. So sad and disheartening that our country has become so divided over politics. Whoever thought that the USA might EVER be on a path toward the sickening, idea of socialism. I would never have thought this in a million years, yet here it is staring us in the face with the prospect of a few blue elections being won. I would be so grateful to see America the way it was before...where our government debated issues and got common sense laws passed that took compromises from both sides and followed the will of the people. What do we have? Oppose, resist, block, threaten, protest, riot, calls for violence and disruption of lives...etc., ad nauseum...not to mention the deep state and the loss of respect and trust for the institutions which were once the backbone of law, order and justice. God help us. |
The issue that divides us
For those of you who do not think Trump is intelligent, he quite accurately identified the primary issue that divides liberals (including democrats) and conservatives (including republicans). In speaking at the UN, Trump stated that "We will never surrender American sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable global bureaucracy. America is governed by Americans," he said. "We reject the ideology of globalism, and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism." This is why I'm against globalist ideas like climate change, open borders, universal healthcare, $15 minimum wage, higher taxes, bigger government bureaucracies, etc. Our core value is liberty (patriotism), which isn't necessarily shared by our globalist friends in Europe. A bigger government equals less liberty.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0_tVMLnj94 |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.